market-monitor

top traders

who is winning across 3 venues, and what they are doing · the tape · positioning

venues 3 traders followed 707 fills 24h 1,232,605 notional 24h $2.29B
venueleadertheir pnlfollowedfills 24hnotional 24hlast fill (UTC)
hyperliquid — — 217 1,172,591 $2.25B 2026-10-06 22:45
lighter — — 95 60,014 $37.8M 2026-10-06 22:37
derive — — 0 0 — —
venue all venues hyperliquid lighter derivewindow 24h 7d 30d all

derive · 24h

0 traders

derive does not honour a 24h window upstream — its board returns the same figures for any period, so nothing is stored under this label rather than a number that would be a quiet lie.

#traderpnlroivolumeaccount value
no board collected yet

hyperliquid's board mixes vault and hlp depositors in with traders — they earn pro-rata returns at high roi on little volume — so rows under $5.0M of volume in the window are left out of it. pnl is realised as each venue books it. roi is against account equity on hyperliquid and lighter; derive publishes no cost basis, so its roi column stays empty rather than carrying a different quantity under the same heading. read roi within a venue, never across.

collection

venuetraders walkedhistory completereaches back tofills recovered
derive 294 294 — 0
hyperliquid 1214 484 2026-03-25 06:04 14,895,920
lighter 928 928 — 0

"history complete" counts traders whose venue has no more to give. hyperliquid keeps roughly the last ten thousand fills per account; lighter publishes no per-account history at all, so its traders are marked complete the moment they are tried.