top traders
who is winning across 3 venues, and what they are doing · the tape · positioning
| venue | leader | their pnl | followed | fills 24h | notional 24h | last fill (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| hyperliquid | — | — | 225 | 1,158,395 | $2.50B | 2026-10-07 03:26 |
| lighter | — | — | 102 | 65,037 | $37.5M | 2026-10-07 03:23 |
| derive | — | — | 0 | 0 | — | — |
derive · 30d
0 traders
derive does not honour a 30d window upstream — its board returns the same figures for any period, so nothing is stored under this label rather than a number that would be a quiet lie.
| # | trader | pnl | roi | volume | account value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no board collected yet | |||||
hyperliquid's board mixes vault and hlp depositors in with traders — they earn pro-rata returns at high roi on little volume — so rows under $5.0M of volume in the window are left out of it. pnl is realised as each venue books it. roi is against account equity on hyperliquid and lighter; derive publishes no cost basis, so its roi column stays empty rather than carrying a different quantity under the same heading. read roi within a venue, never across.
collection
| venue | traders walked | history complete | reaches back to | fills recovered |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| derive | 294 | 294 | — | 0 |
| hyperliquid | 1219 | 485 | 2026-03-25 06:04 | 14,915,490 |
| lighter | 931 | 931 | — | 0 |
"history complete" counts traders whose venue has no more to give. hyperliquid keeps roughly the last ten thousand fills per account; lighter publishes no per-account history at all, so its traders are marked complete the moment they are tried.